For insurers, it represents a vital opportunity to demonstrate the industry’s essential role: Delivering liquidity at the very moment when businesses and families are most exposed.
The relevance of this risk is surfacing at a time of extraordinary significance. Asia is in the middle of the largest transfer of wealth in history, with trillions of dollars expected to pass between generations over the next decade.
Succession plans, however, assume the founder or principal lives long enough to see them through. The harsh reality is that death does not wait for transition timetables, and too many family enterprises are left without safeguards.
The fallout from a principal’s unexpected passing is oftentimes swift and devastating. Leadership uncertainty quickly breeds family conflict. Creditors lose confidence and call in loans. Liquidity dries up at precisely the moment it is most needed. Staff and suppliers must still be paid, but revenues falter.
The result, too often, is a fire-sale of core assets at a fraction of their true value. These are foreseeable, insurable risks. Yet in Asia, they remain widely overlooked.
The closure of a Chinese Restaurant Group’s restaurant chain in the 90s, one of the largest restaurant chains in Singapore at the time, illustrates this vulnerability with painful clarity.
In 1992, the owner died suddenly of a stroke while overseas. Within weeks, the thriving chain of 18 outlets employing more than 500 staff began collapsing. His widow, unfamiliar with the operations, could not prevent the unravelling.
With no liquidity buffer and creditors circling, the entire business ground to a halt. And while the chain was eventually sold, the widow received only a fraction of the money from the sale due to huge debts that had been racked up.
This was not the collapse of a weak company – it was the collapse of a business unprotected against the sudden loss of its architect of value. A properly structured key person insurance policy could have made the difference, injecting funds to stabilise payroll, satisfy creditors, and buy time for succession.
Why Asian families are uniquely exposed
Asia’s family enterprises face additional vulnerabilities rooted in culture and law. In Muslim-majority jurisdictions such as Malaysia and Indonesia, faraid (Islamic inheritance) laws govern how assets must be divided, often fracturing control of a business. Life insurance is one of the few tools that may provide liquidity outside these frameworks, ensuring continuity.
Among Chinese families, cultural taboos around discussing death often delay planning until it is too late. Even when wills are in place, they are frequently “mirror wills” that divide everything equally among heirs. Equal on paper, this can be paralysing in practice. One heir may wish to sell, another to hold, another to occupy a property or continue running the business. Without liquidity to resolve the deadlock, families become locked in disputes that erode both wealth and relationships.
This is why key person insurance should be seen not just as protection against lost profits, but as an estate equaliser.
Challenges: Cross-border complexity, probate delays, determining value
Cross-border families face another layer of complexity. Estate taxes in markets such as the US, UK, or Japan can drain value if liquidity is not immediately available. Even without taxation, the administrative costs of probate could be heavy.
Experience tells us that when assets are spread across several jurisdictions, probate can drag on for years, even in the absence of conflict among heirs. Differing legal requirements, incomplete documentation, and cross-border tax issues often combine to freeze wealth at precisely the moment it is needed most. Key person insurance cannot solve these administrative hurdles, but it can provide liquidity to bridge the gap until estates are settled.
And yet, misconceptions persist. Many families will insure senior executives or rainmakers but not the principal, underestimating their own irreplaceability. Leaders often imagine themselves as “just running things” without recognising that their presence is the cornerstone of value. Only when advisers walk them through a “day after” scenario do they grasp how quickly banks and creditors could pull the rug out from under their business.
The other challenge for insurers lies in how difficult it can be to value this risk. Multiplying salary or annual profits does not adequately capture the true worth of a founder whose judgement, reputation, and networks are the company’s intangible assets. Independent valuations and impact assessments provide the best measure, but owners too often balk at the cost, even as they willingly spend millions on equipment or property in which they see definitive value.
Equally problematic is the reliance on short-term cover for what is, in reality, a lifelong exposure. Cheaper term policies may expire long before the leader does, leaving the family vulnerable when protection is most needed.
Insurance must do better
For our industry, these challenges are also an opportunity. Key person insurance must move beyond rigid, one-size-fits-all products. Families need flexibility in how benefits are structured and paid – some may want immediate liquidity in one tranche, others may prefer staged payouts aligned to estate distribution or buy-sell agreements. Cross-border structures should be made easier to arrange, and underwriting needs to reflect the unique realities of UHNW families.
It is also important not to lose sight of the fundamentals. Needs for liquidity, debt repayment, and continuity are evergreen. Innovation has a role, but it must enhance the delivery of liquidity and continuity, not obscure or complicate them.
Claims processes are another basic, yet critical area. Too often they feel designed to delay or discourage. At a time of grief, beneficiaries may confront unnecessary paperwork, rigid procedures, and long waits. This is when the human dimension of insurance matters most.
Families who have just lost a loved one are overwhelmed. They are in shock, disoriented, and struggling to make sense of what comes next. The role of the insurer should be to stand beside them, not to burden them with endless forms and irrelevant documentation. Too often, insurers require families to provide an exhaustive list of documents, many of which add little real value, before releasing funds.
If insurance is to prove its value at the point of need, claims must be fast, empathetic, and frictionless. The measure of an insurer is not the size of its balance sheet, but the speed and humanity with which it delivers on its promise.
Continuity or collapse
Asia’s great wealth transfer is already underway. For many families, it will be the defining financial event of their lives. The real question is whether the enterprises that created this wealth will survive to pass it on.
When the architect of value is gone, everything built is left exposed. Insurance cannot replace leadership, but it can preserve the foundations long enough for families to rebuild. That’s not just protection – it’s the difference between continuity and collapse.
This article was first published in Asia Insurance Review.